Classify MDS subtypes, identify dysplastic morphology, and interpret cytogenetics for ASCP BOC hematology exam.

ASCPprep.com | Hematology

Chapter 20 โ€” MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES

ASCP Board Exam ยท Lab-Focused Study Guide
Etiology & Apoptosis ยท Dyserythropoiesis ยท Dysmyelopoiesis ยท Dysmegakaryopoiesis ยท Differential Diagnosis ยท Abnormal Function ยท FAB vs WHO 2008 Classification (RCUD, RARS, RCMD, RAEB-1/2, del(5q), MDS-U, Childhood) ยท MDS/MPN (CMML, aCML, JMML, RARS-T) ยท Cytogenetics & Molecular ยท IPSS-R ยท Treatment ยท Practice Questions

1 ยท Priority Table & Quick Foundation

Topic Priority Why It’s Tested
MDS definition: clonal, progressive cytopenias despite cellular marrow + dyspoiesis HIGH Rodak Q2; the core concept
Dyspoietic morphology in each lineage (Boxes 34-1 to 34-3) HIGH Film recognition (Rodak Q3)
Ring sideroblast definition: โ‰ฅ5 iron granules circling โ‰ฅโ…“ of the nucleus HIGH Rodak Q4
WHO 2008 blast cutoffs: RCUD/RCMD <5% marrow, RAEB-1 5โ€“9%, RAEB-2 10โ€“19%, AML โ‰ฅ20% HIGH Rodak Q5; Table 34-1
Exclude Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate deficiency before diagnosing MDS HIGH Rodak Q6; case study
MDS with isolated del(5q): women, anemia, normal/โ†‘ platelets, hypolobulated megakaryocytes, lenalidomide HIGH Rodak Q7
CMML: monocytes >1 ร— 10โน/L, BCR-ABL1 negative, <20% blasts โ€” MDS/MPN HIGH Rodak Q10
FAB vs WHO differences (30% vs 20% blasts; CMML and RAEB-t removed) MEDIUM Classification history
Cytogenetics: +8 and โˆ’7 most common; del(5q) specific; IPSS-R MEDIUM Prognosis
Therapy-related MDS (4โ€“7 years after therapy; now t-myeloid neoplasm) MEDIUM Etiology
Treatment: supportive, growth factors, azacitidine/decitabine, lenalidomide, HSCT MEDIUM Management
aCML, JMML (NF1), RARS-T (JAK2) LOW Recognition
๐ŸŽฏ KEY POINT โ€” Where to spend your time

Focus: the dyspoietic features (oval macrocytes, dimorphic RBCs, ring sideroblasts, pseudo-Pelger-Huรซt and agranular neutrophils, micromegakaryocytes), WHO 2008 blast thresholds, del(5q) syndrome, CMML criteria, and ruling out Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate deficiency. Skim: IPSS-R point values, epigenetic mechanisms, individual gene frequencies.

Quick Foundation โ€” from zero

  • MDS = a group of acquired clonal stem cell disorders. The marrow is usually full of cells, but the cells are made badly and many die before release โ†’ cytopenias in the blood (ineffective hematopoiesis).
  • The cells that do come out look abnormal (dyspoiesis) and often work abnormally.
  • The disease mostly affects the elderly (median age 70) and can stay stable for years or progress to acute myeloid leukemia.
  • The key number is the blast percentage: MDS has <20% blasts; โ‰ฅ20% is AML (WHO).
  • Always rule out the look-alikes โ€” especially Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate deficiency, which also causes macrocytes and dysplasia.
๐Ÿ’ก Analogy

Picture a factory with a broken quality-control line. The shop floor (marrow) is crowded with workers, but most products are defective and get scrapped before shipping (apoptosis in the marrow). The few that leave the factory are oddly shaped (oval macrocytes, agranular neutrophils, giant platelets) and don’t work well. Over time the machines can go haywire and start pumping out unfinished parts (blasts) โ€” that’s the shift to AML.

๐Ÿฅ Why this matters clinically

Many elderly patients with unexplained anemia or macrocytosis have MDS. Missing Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate deficiency and labeling it MDS would withhold a simple cure; missing MDS delays prognostic workup. Blast counts and karyotype decide whether a patient gets supportive care, lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents or a stem cell transplant.

Concept Plain-English Explanation
Dyspoiesis (dysplasia) Abnormal-looking cell development in a lineage
Ineffective hematopoiesis Marrow is busy, but cells die before reaching the blood
Ring sideroblast Erythroid precursor with iron-loaded mitochondria circling the nucleus
Unilineage / multilineage dysplasia Dysplasia in one / two or more myeloid lines
Blast Very immature cell; โ‰ฅ20% means acute leukemia (WHO)
Therapy-related MDS (t-MDS) MDS that follows chemotherapy or radiation
MDS/MPN Overlap diseases with both dysplastic and proliferative features (e.g., CMML)
IPSS-R Scoring system predicting survival and AML risk in MDS

2 ยท Core Content Tables

2.1 History & Definition

Feature Details
Old names Refractory anemia, smoldering leukemia, oligoblastic leukemia, preleukemia
FAB (1982) French-American-British group defined MDS by morphology
WHO (1997, revised 2008) Adds molecular, cytogenetic and immunologic criteria
Definition Acquired clonal disorders with progressive cytopenias reflecting defects in erythroid, myeloid and/or megakaryocytic maturation
Common to all MDS (1) Progressive cytopenias despite cellular marrow ยท (2) dyspoiesis in one or more lines
Age Median 70; rare <50 unless after chemo/radiation; fastest-growing group >60

2.2 Etiology

Feature Details
Primary (de novo) Proliferation of abnormal stem cells โ€” defect at the myeloid stem cell level (erythroid, myeloid, megakaryocytic lines affected); rarely โ†’ ALL (stem cell may have lost lymphoid potential)
Causes / associations Cumulative environmental exposure; chemicals, radiation, viral infection; smoking; inherited hematologic disorders
Apoptosis paradox Early MDS: โ†‘ apoptosis โ†’ peripheral cytopenias ยท later (toward leukemia): โ†“ apoptosis โ†’ survival and expansion of the clone
Other factors Antiangiogenic cytokines, TNF, immune system, marrow microenvironment; โ†‘ angiogenic factors (VEGF)
Therapy-related MDS After chemotherapy/radiotherapy; median onset 4โ€“7 years after therapy; G-CSF/GM-CSF also โ†‘ risk; more aggressive, quickly โ†’ AML. WHO 2008 places t-MDS with therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (AML category)

2.3 Morphologic Evidence of Dyspoiesis (Rodak Boxes 34-1, 34-2, 34-3)

Dyserythropoiesis Dysmyelopoiesis Dysmegakaryopoiesis
Oval macrocytes (most common blood finding) Persistent basophilic cytoplasm (nuclear-cytoplasmic asynchrony) Giant platelets
Hypochromic microcytes (with adequate iron) Abnormal granulation: hypo-/agranular or larger granules Platelets with abnormal granulation (hypo-/agranular); large fused granules
Dimorphic RBC population (clonality) Abnormal nuclear shapes: hyposegmentation (pseudo-Pelger-Huรซt), hypersegmentation, nuclear rings Circulating micromegakaryocytes
RBC precursors with >1 nucleus Uneven cytoplasmic staining (dense basophilic rim) Large mononuclear megakaryocytes
Abnormal nuclear shapes: lobes, buds, fragments, internuclear bridging Agranular promyelocytes/myelocytes (can be mistaken for blasts) Micromegakaryocytes or micromegakaryoblasts
Uneven cytoplasmic staining; basophilic stippling Occasional Auer rod Bilobed or multiple small separated nuclei
Ring sideroblasts; megaloblastoid development with normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate Monocytic hyperplasia common in marrow
Also: poikilocytosis, Howell-Jolly bodies, siderocytes Agranular bands misclassified as monocytes

2.4 Additional Marrow Findings

Feature Details
Erythroid Hyperplasia or hypoplasia
Myeloid Hypoplasia or hyperplasia
ALIP* Abnormal localization of immature precursors: myeloblasts/promyelocytes cluster centrally in biopsy sections instead of along the endosteal surface โ€” characteristic of MDS
Ring sideroblast Erythroid precursor with โ‰ฅ5 iron granules whose mitochondria circle โ‰ฅโ…“ of the nucleus (Prussian blue)

*The acronym ALIP is standard terminology; Rodak describes the finding without the abbreviation.

2.5 Differential Diagnosis โ€” Dysplasia Is Not Enough

Feature Details
Vitamin Bโ‚โ‚‚ or folate deficiency Pancytopenia + dysplasia (megaloblastic) โ€” always check levels
Heavy metals Exposure (e.g., arsenic, lead*) can cause dysplasia
Copper deficiency Reversible myelodysplasia
Congenital Fanconi anemia, congenital dyserythropoietic anemia
Infections Parvovirus B19, HIV
Drugs Chemotherapeutic agents
PNH Similar features
Key step Thorough history and physical, including drug and chemical exposures

*Specific metals are general-reference examples; Rodak says ‘exposure to heavy metals’.

2.6 Abnormal Cellular Function

Feature Details
Granulocytes โ†“ Adhesion, deficient phagocytosis, โ†“ chemotaxis, impaired microbicidal capacity; โ†“ MPO and alkaline phosphatase
RBCs Shortened survival; erythroid precursors respond poorly to EPO
Platelets Increased bleeding despite adequate platelet numbers
Depends on The specific stem cell mutation

2.7 FAB vs WHO Classification

Feature FAB (1982) WHO (2008)
Basis Morphology only (dysplasia + marrow blasts) Morphology + molecular, cytogenetic, immunologic
AML blast threshold โ‰ฅ30% โ‰ฅ20%
Categories RA ยท RARS ยท RAEB ยท CMML ยท RAEB-t RCUD ยท RARS ยท RCMD ยท RAEB-1/2 ยท del(5q) ยท MDS-U ยท childhood (provisional)
CMML In MDS Moved to MDS/MPN
RAEB-t (20โ€“29% blasts) In MDS Now AML
Therapy-related, childhood MDS Not addressed Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms; refractory cytopenia of childhood

2.8 WHO 2008 MDS Categories (Rodak Table 34-1)

Disease Blood Bone Marrow
RCUD (RA, RN, RT) Unicytopenia (bicytopenia occasionally); no/rare blasts (<1%) Unilineage dysplasia โ‰ฅ10% of one lineage; <5% blasts; <15% of erythroid precursors are ring sideroblasts
RARS Anemia; no blasts โ‰ฅ15% ring sideroblasts; erythroid dysplasia only; <5% blasts
RCMD Cytopenia(s); <1% blasts; no Auer rods; monocytes <1 ร— 10โน/L Dysplasia โ‰ฅ10% in two or more lineages; <5% blasts; no Auer rods; ยฑ 15% ring sideroblasts
RAEB-1 Cytopenia(s); <5% blasts (2โ€“4%); no Auer rods; monocytes <1 ร— 10โน/L Uni- or multilineage dysplasia; 5โ€“9% blasts; no Auer rods
RAEB-2 Cytopenia(s); 5โ€“19% blasts; ยฑ Auer rods; monocytes <1 ร— 10โน/L Uni- or multilineage dysplasia; 10โ€“19% blasts; ยฑ Auer rods
MDS-U Cytopenia(s); โ‰ค1% blasts Unequivocal dysplasia in <10% of cells in โ‰ฅ1 lineage with a cytogenetic abnormality presumptive of MDS; <5% blasts
MDS with isolated del(5q) Anemia; platelets usually normal or โ†‘; <1% blasts Normal to โ†‘ megakaryocytes with hypolobulated nuclei; <5% blasts; isolated del(5q); no Auer rods

Footnotes: pancytopenia in RCUD โ†’ MDS-U. Marrow <5% blasts but blood 2โ€“4% โ†’ RAEB-1. RCUD/RCMD with 1% blood blasts โ†’ MDS-U. Auer rods with <5% blood and <10% marrow blasts โ†’ RAEB-2.

2.9 WHO Categories โ€” Clinical Details

Feature Details
RCUD Symptoms from the cytopenia (fatigue/dyspnea, infections, bleeding). Includes RA (<15% ring sideroblasts), refractory neutropenia, refractory thrombocytopenia. Cytogenetic abnormalities in up to 50% of RA (none specific). Median survival 2โ€“5 years; only 2% โ†’ AML
RARS Anemia + dyserythropoiesis; >15% ring sideroblasts; dimorphic blood picture; older patients; mean survival 69โ€“108 months. RARS with marked thrombocytosis + JAK2 V617F โ†’ MDS/MPN (RARS-T). Acquired sideroblastic anemia is not MDS
RCMD One or more cytopenias, dysplasia in โ‰ฅ2 lines, <1% blood and <5% marrow blasts, no Auer rods (Auer rods โ†’ RAEB-2). RCMD with >15% ring sideroblasts stays RCMD โ€” more aggressive than RARS
RAEB Trilineage cytopenias, marked dysmyelopoiesis/dysmegakaryopoiesis; blood 2โ€“19%, marrow 5โ€“19% blasts; RAEB-1 vs RAEB-2 by blast %. Auer rods โ†’ RAEB-2 regardless of blast count. >10% marrow blasts = more aggressive
del(5q) (5qโˆ’ syndrome) Mostly women, median age 67; refractory anemia ยฑ thrombocytosis; hypolobulated megakaryocytes; erythroid hypoplasia; <5% blasts; no Auer rods; long stable course (median survival 145 months). Lenalidomide effective
MDS-U Lacks features for a specific category; reclassify if features develop
Childhood MDS De novo very rare; provisional refractory cytopenia of childhood

2.10 Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (Rodak Box 34-5)

Disorder Key Criteria Notes
CMML Persistent monocytosis >1.0 ร— 10โน/L; no BCR-ABL1; <20% blasts + promonocytes in blood and marrow; dysplasia in โ‰ฅ1 myeloid line โ†‘ WBC with absolute monocytosis; dysgranulopoiesis; neutrophil precursors <10% of WBCs; splenomegaly (leukemic infiltration). Cytogenetic abnormalities in up to 40% (none specific). CMML-1: <5% blood, <10% marrow blasts+promonocytes; CMML-2: 5โ€“19% blood or 10โ€“19% marrow (worse)
Atypical CML, BCR-ABL1 negative Leukocytosis with dysplastic neutrophils and precursors; multilineage dysplasia; basophilia not prominent Pelger-Huรซtโ€“like cells, hypogranularity, bizarre segmentation; poor prognosis (AML or marrow failure)
JMML Clonal granulocytic + monocytic proliferation in children 1 monthโ€“14 years Strong association with neurofibromatosis type 1; allogeneic HSCT effective in ~50%
MDS/MPN, unclassifiable Meets MDS/MPN criteria but no subcategory Provisional RARS-T: RARS + thrombocytosis + JAK2 V617F

2.11 Cytogenetics, Molecular Alterations & Epigenetics

Feature Details
Frequency Chromosome abnormalities in ~50% of de novo MDS and 90โ€“95% of t-MDS
Importance Karyotype strongly affects prognosis; may predict response to treatment
Balanced translocations Common in AML but rare in de novo MDS
Specificity Except del(5q), no abnormality is specific to a subtype
Common chromosomes 5, 7, 8, 11, 13, 20
Most common single abnormalities Trisomy 8 and monosomy 7; less common 12pโˆ’, iso 17, โˆ’22, loss of Y
Mutations TP53, RUNX1, TET2 most common (not specific); NRAS in a small percentage (~20% in treatment section). Multistep process to AML. TET2 = more favorable; TP53 = higher transformation risk
Epigenetics Gene expression changes without DNA sequence change; tumor-suppressor/apoptosis genes hypermethylated; demethylating agents slow progression

2.12 Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R, Rodak Table 34-2)

Parameter 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 3 4
Cytogenetics Very good โ€” Good โ€” Intermediate Poor Very poor
Marrow blasts (%) โ‰ค2 โ€” >2 to <5 โ€” 5โ€“10 >10 โ€”
Hemoglobin (g/dL) โ‰ฅ10 โ€” 8 to <10 <8 โ€” โ€” โ€”
Platelets (ร— 10โน/L) โ‰ฅ100 50 to <100 <50 โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€”
ANC (ร— 10โน/L) โ‰ฅ0.8 <0.8 โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€” โ€”
Risk Group (Score) Median Survival Karyotype Group Examples
Very low (โ‰ค1.5) 8.8 years Very good โˆ’Y, del(11q)
Low (>1.5โ€“3) 5.3 years Good Normal, del(5q), del(12p), del(20q), double incl. del(5q)
Intermediate (>3โ€“4.5) 3.0 years Intermediate del(7q), +8, +19, i(17q), any other single/double
High (>4.5โ€“6) 1.6 years Poor โˆ’7, inv(3)/t(3q)/del(3q), double incl. โˆ’7/del(7q), complex 3 abnormalities
Very high (>6) 0.8 years Very poor Complex >3 abnormalities

IPSS (1997) used cytogenetics, marrow blasts and cytopenias; IPSS-R (2012) split cytogenetics into five groups, refined blast groups and added depth of cytopenias. Age, ferritin, performance status and LDH affect survival but not AML transformation.

2.13 Treatment

Feature Details
Goal Improve quality of life and prolong survival (many patients elderly with comorbidities)
Supportive care Main mode for most: RBC and platelet transfusions; prevent/treat infection
Low-risk Growth factors (EPO, TPO, G-CSF) โ€” some respond despite normal levels; immunosuppression (antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine) โ†“ leukemic transformation
Lenalidomide (Revlimid, 2005) Thalidomide analogue for low/intermediate-risk MDS, especially del(5q): transfusion independence 64%, median Hb +3.9 g/dL, complete cytogenetic remission 55%; immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic; can cause myelosuppression
Hypomethylating agents Azacitidine and decitabine (DNMT inhibitors) โ€” high-risk MDS; low dose, minimal side effects
Farnesyltransferase inhibitors Target NRAS-mutated MDS (~20%)
Cure Hematopoietic stem cell transplant โ€” consider for IPSS intermediate-2 or higher, or >10% blasts; best if <70 without comorbidity
Future Apoptosis-controlling drugs; customized plans; informed patient decisions

3 ยท Visual Memory Hooks

๐Ÿง  MDS in one line
โ€œBusy marrow, empty blood, ugly cellsโ€.
๐Ÿง  Apoptosis paradox
โ€œEarly MDS kills too many; late MDS kills too fewโ€.
๐Ÿง  Top blood clue
โ€œOval macrocytes + normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate = think MDSโ€.
๐Ÿง  Ring sideroblast
โ€œFive beads around a thirdโ€ โ€” โ‰ฅ5 granules, โ‰ฅโ…“ of the nucleus.
๐Ÿง  RARS threshold
โ€œ15 rings = RARSโ€ (โ‰ฅ15% ring sideroblasts).
๐Ÿง  Blast ladder
โ€œ<5 Calm (RCUD/RCMD), 5โ€“9 RAEB-1, 10โ€“19 RAEB-2, 20 = AMLโ€.
๐Ÿง  Auer rods
โ€œAn Auer rod Automatically upgrades to RAEB-2โ€.
๐Ÿง  FAB vs WHO
โ€œFAB needed 30, WHO needs 20โ€.
๐Ÿง  5qโˆ’
โ€œ5qโˆ’ = Female, Fine platelets (normal/high), Floppy (hypolobulated) megakaryocytes, lenalidomideโ€.
๐Ÿง  RCMD vs RARS
โ€œMore lines = More troubleโ€ โ€” multilineage beats ring sideroblasts.
๐Ÿง  CMML
โ€œMonocytes over 1, no Philly, blasts under 20โ€.
๐Ÿง  JMML
โ€œJMML Joins NF1โ€.
๐Ÿง  RARS-T
โ€œRings + Thrombocytosis + JAK2โ€.
๐Ÿง  Cytogenetics
โ€œ8 up, 7 downโ€ โ€” trisomy 8, monosomy 7 most common.
๐Ÿง  Mutations
โ€œTP53 = Terrible; TET2 = Tolerableโ€.
๐Ÿง  Treatment
โ€œLow risk: Lenalidomide/growth factors ยท High risk: Aza/Decitabine ยท Cure: transplantโ€.

Pattern Triggers

If you seeโ€ฆ Thinkโ€ฆ Becauseโ€ฆ
Elderly, pancytopenia, MCV 110, normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate, cellular marrow MDS Ineffective hematopoiesis
Same picture but low Bโ‚โ‚‚, hypersegmented neutrophils Megaloblastic anemia Treatable mimic
Dimorphic RBCs, โ‰ฅ15% ring sideroblasts, erythroid dysplasia only RARS
Ring sideroblasts + dysplasia in neutrophils and megakaryocytes RCMD Multilineage wins
Marrow blasts 7% RAEB-1
Marrow blasts 4% with Auer rods RAEB-2 Auer rod rule
Marrow blasts 23% AML (WHO) โ‰ฅ20%
Elderly woman, macrocytic anemia, platelets 550, hypolobulated megakaryocytes, isolated del(5q) MDS with isolated del(5q) Lenalidomide
Monocytes 2.5 ร— 10โน/L, dysplasia, splenomegaly, BCR-ABL1 โˆ’ CMML MDS/MPN
Child with NF1, monocytosis, splenomegaly JMML
Leukocytosis with dysplastic, hypogranular, Pelger-like neutrophils, Ph โˆ’ Atypical CML
MDS 5 years after breast cancer chemotherapy Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm Complex karyotype, aggressive
Agranular ‘monocytes’ in a differential Agranular neutrophils/bands (dysmyelopoiesis) Misclassification risk
Normal platelet count but bleeding Platelet dysfunction in MDS Abnormal function

Commonly Confused Pairs

Feature A B
MDS vs megaloblastic anemia Normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate; ring sideroblasts, dimorphism Low Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate; corrects with vitamins
MDS vs aplastic anemia* Cellular dysplastic marrow Hypocellular marrow without dysplasia
RARS vs acquired sideroblastic anemia Clonal MDS Reversible (alcohol, drugs) โ€” not MDS
RARS vs RCMD Erythroid dysplasia only; better survival โ‰ฅ2 lineages; more aggressive
RAEB-1 vs RAEB-2 Marrow 5โ€“9%, blood <5% Marrow 10โ€“19%, blood 5โ€“19%, or Auer rods
RCUD vs MDS-U Unicytopenia Pancytopenia, 1% blood blasts, or <10% dysplasia + cytogenetics
FAB RAEB-t vs WHO 20โ€“29% blasts = MDS = AML
CMML vs CML Monocytosis, BCR-ABL1 โˆ’ Basophilia, BCR-ABL1 +
CMML-1 vs CMML-2 Blood <5%, marrow <10% blasts+promonocytes 5โ€“19% / 10โ€“19%
Pseudo-Pelger-Huรซt vs true PHA Acquired, hypogranular, MDS Inherited, normal granulation
Agranular promyelocyte vs blast Dysplastic granule loss True blast โ€” affects AML count

*Aplastic anemia comparison from Ch. 11 of this course, not Rodak Ch. 34.

Timeline Table

Event Timing / Value Key Point Best Exam Use
FAB classification 1982 Morphology, 30% blasts History
WHO classification 1997, revised 2008 20% blasts History
Therapy-related MDS onset 4โ€“7 years after therapy Aggressive Etiology
IPSS / IPSS-R 1997 / 2012 Prognosis Scoring
Lenalidomide FDA approval 2005 Low/int risk, del(5q) Treatment
RCUD survival 2โ€“5 years; 2% โ†’ AML Low risk Prognosis
RARS survival 69โ€“108 months Low risk Prognosis
del(5q) survival Median 145 months Best Prognosis
IPSS-R very high 0.8 years Worst Prognosis

4 ยท Diagnostic Flowcharts

Flowchart 1 โ€” Cytopenia with macrocytosis in an older adult

Pancytopenia/anemia + โ†‘ MCV โ†’ Check Bโ‚โ‚‚, folate, copper, drugs, alcohol, HIV/parvovirus
Deficiency found โ†’ Treat and reassess โ€” not MDS
All normal, dysplasia on film โ†’ Marrow aspirate + biopsy with iron stain
Cellular marrow, dysplasia โ‰ฅ10% in a lineage โ†’ MDS โ†’ count blasts, ring sideroblasts
Karyotype โ†’ Classify (del(5q)) and score IPSS-R
โš ๏ธ Common mistake: labeling macrocytic dysplasia as MDS without measuring Bโ‚โ‚‚ and folate.

Flowchart 2 โ€” WHO 2008 classification by blasts

Marrow blasts โ‰ฅ20% (or blood โ‰ฅ20%) โ†’ AML
Marrow 10โ€“19% or blood 5โ€“19% or Auer rods โ†’ RAEB-2
Marrow 5โ€“9% or blood 2โ€“4% โ†’ RAEB-1
Marrow <5%, blood <1% โ†’ Go to Flowchart 3 (lineages/ring sideroblasts/del(5q))
Blood exactly 1% with RCUD/RCMD features โ†’ MDS-U
โš ๏ธ Common mistake: forgetting that blood blasts alone (2โ€“4%) upgrade a case to RAEB-1.

Flowchart 3 โ€” Low-blast MDS subtypes

Isolated del(5q), hypolobulated megakaryocytes โ†’ MDS with isolated del(5q)
Dysplasia in โ‰ฅ2 lineages โ†’ RCMD (even with โ‰ฅ15% ring sideroblasts)
Erythroid dysplasia only + โ‰ฅ15% ring sideroblasts โ†’ RARS
One lineage dysplastic, <15% ring sideroblasts, uni/bicytopenia โ†’ RCUD (RA, RN, RT)
Pancytopenia with unilineage dysplasia, or <10% dysplasia + MDS karyotype โ†’ MDS-U
โš ๏ธ Common mistake: calling a case RARS because of many ring sideroblasts when neutrophils and megakaryocytes are also dysplastic.

Flowchart 4 โ€” Monocytosis with dysplasia

Monocytes >1 ร— 10โน/L persistently โ†’ Exclude reactive causes
BCR-ABL1 test โ†’ Positive โ†’ CML ยท negative โ†’ continue
Blasts + promonocytes <20% + dysplasia โ†’ CMML
Blood <5% / marrow <10% โ†’ CMML-1 ยท higher โ†’ CMML-2
Child 1 monthโ€“14 years, NF1 โ†’ JMML
โš ๏ธ Common mistake: counting promonocytes as mature monocytes โ€” they count with blasts.

Flowchart 5 โ€” Case study reasoning

43-year-old: pancytopenia, MCV 132, normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate โ†’ Differential: megaloblastic anemia, MDS, drugs/alcohol, liver disease, HIV/parvovirus
Marrow: dysplastic megaloblastoid erythroid line, adequate megakaryocytes, dup(1q) โ†’ Probable MDS (dyserythropoiesis with clonal karyotype)
6 years later: dysplasia in erythroid, granulocytic and megakaryocytic lines + 50โ€“60% ring sideroblasts โ†’ Multilineage dysplasia
WHO 2008 โ†’ RCMD (ring sideroblasts don’t make it RARS when โ‰ฅ2 lineages are dysplastic)*
โš ๏ธ Common mistake: choosing RARS because of the ring sideroblasts.

*My interpretation โ€” the case answer key isn’t in the upload. At presentation, pancytopenia with erythroid-only dysplasia would fall into MDS-U per the Table 34-1 footnote.

Flowchart 6 โ€” Choosing therapy

Low risk, symptomatic anemia โ†’ Transfusion ยฑ EPO/growth factors
Isolated del(5q) โ†’ Lenalidomide
Hypoplastic/low risk โ†’ Immunosuppression (ATG, cyclosporine)
High risk โ†’ Azacitidine or decitabine
IPSS int-2 or higher, or >10% blasts, <70, fit โ†’ Allogeneic HSCT (only cure)
โš ๏ธ Common mistake: giving aggressive chemotherapy to a stable del(5q) patient โ€” supportive care and lenalidomide are preferred.

5 ยท 25 High-Yield Facts

# Fact
1 MDSs are acquired clonal stem cell disorders with progressive cytopenias and dyspoiesis.
2 Progressive cytopenias despite a cellular marrow are common to all MDS.
3 The median age at MDS diagnosis is about 70; MDS is most common in people older than 50.
4 Apoptosis is increased in early MDS and decreased as the disease progresses toward leukemia.
5 Therapy-related MDS appears 4โ€“7 years after chemotherapy or radiation and is often aggressive.
6 Oval macrocytes are the most common peripheral blood finding of dyserythropoiesis.
7 A dimorphic RBC population is evidence of clonality in MDS.
8 Target cells are not a characteristic diagnostic clue for MDS.
9 A ring sideroblast has at least 5 iron granules encircling at least one third of the nucleus.
10 Dysmyelopoiesis includes hypogranular neutrophils, pseudo-Pelger-Huรซt nuclei and nuclear rings.
11 Agranular bands can be misclassified as monocytes, and agranular promyelocytes as blasts.
12 Dysmegakaryopoiesis includes giant platelets, abnormal granulation and micromegakaryocytes.
13 Abnormal localization of immature precursors (central clusters) is characteristic of MDS biopsies.
14 Vitamin Bโ‚โ‚‚ and folate deficiency must be excluded before diagnosing MDS.
15 MDS neutrophils may have decreased myeloperoxidase and alkaline phosphatase.
16 WHO lowered the AML blast threshold from 30% (FAB) to 20%.
17 RARS requires โ‰ฅ15% ring sideroblasts with erythroid-only dysplasia.
18 RAEB-1 has 5โ€“9% marrow blasts; RAEB-2 has 10โ€“19% marrow blasts or Auer rods.
19 MDS with isolated del(5q) affects mainly women, shows hypolobulated megakaryocytes and responds to lenalidomide.
20 CMML requires monocytes >1 ร— 10โน/L, no BCR-ABL1, and <20% blasts + promonocytes.
21 WHO classifies CMML as a myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm.
22 JMML is strongly associated with neurofibromatosis type 1.
23 Trisomy 8 and monosomy 7 are the most common single cytogenetic abnormalities in MDS.
24 MDS often converts to AML; neuropathy is not a usual cause of death.
25 Azacitidine and decitabine are hypomethylating agents; stem cell transplant is the only cure.
โญ EXAM TIP โ€” The single most testable pattern

Older adult + cytopenias + oval macrocytes + normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate + cellular dysplastic marrow = MDS. Then classify by blasts (<5, 5โ€“9, 10โ€“19, โ‰ฅ20 = AML), lineages (one vs โ‰ฅ2), ring sideroblasts (โ‰ฅ15%) and del(5q). Monocytes >1 ร— 10โน/L โ†’ CMML (MDS/MPN).

Quick Interpretation Table

Lab Finding Clinical Interpretation
43-year-old: WBC 2.2, Hb 6.1, platelets 51, MCV 132, normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate; later trilineage dysplasia + 50โ€“60% ring sideroblasts MDS โ€” RCMD (Rodak case study, my interpretation)
60-year-old woman: Hb 8, platelets 550, WBC 3.8, erythroid hypoplasia, hypolobulated megakaryocytes, isolated del(5q) MDS with isolated del(5q) โ†’ supportive care; lenalidomide if it progresses (Rodak Q7)
Anemia, oval macrocytes, hypersegmented neutrophils Order Bโ‚โ‚‚ and folate first (Rodak Q6)
Marrow blasts 12%, blood blasts 3% RAEB-2
Marrow 3% blasts, Auer rods present RAEB-2
Blood 3% blasts, marrow 4% RAEB-1
Monocytes 3.2 ร— 10โน/L, blasts + promonocytes 12% marrow, BCR-ABL1 โˆ’ CMML-2
Karyotype: 4 unrelated abnormalities Very poor IPSS-R cytogenetics

๐ŸŽด Flashcards โ€” Active Recall Practice

How it works: tap the card to flip it. Then mark it โœ“ Knew It or โœ— Review Again (buttons unlock after flipping). Use ๐Ÿ”€ Shuffle to randomize and ๐Ÿ Finish anytime โ€” your summary appears at the end, and you can drill only the cards you missed.

๐Ÿ“ Practice Quiz โ€” Test Your Knowledge

How it works: tap an answer for each case. You’ll get instant feedback with the full explanation and the examiner’s trap. Your final score appears once all 10 are answered.

๐Ÿชค Trap Questions โ€” Beat the Examiner

Harder on purpose. Each question targets a real misconception. After answering you’ll see the correct reasoning, the trap explained, why the examiner wrote it, and the wrong answer most students choose.

8 ยท Rapid Revision Sheet

๐Ÿ“– READ THIS 2 HOURS BEFORE YOUR EXAM

Basics

  • Clonal myeloid stem cell disorder
  • Cytopenias + cellular marrow + dyspoiesis
  • Median age 70; rare <50
  • Early โ†‘ apoptosis โ†’ late โ†“ apoptosis
  • t-MDS 4โ€“7 yr after therapy; aggressive

Dyserythropoiesis

  • Oval macrocytes (most common)
  • Dimorphic RBCs ยท hypochromic microcytes
  • Multinuclear, buds, bridging, stippling
  • Ring sideroblasts: โ‰ฅ5 granules, โ‰ฅโ…“ nucleus
  • Megaloblastoid with normal Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate

Dysmyelo & Dysmegakaryo

  • Hypo/agranular neutrophils, pseudo-PHA, rings
  • Persistent basophilic cytoplasm
  • Agranular bands โ‰  monocytes
  • Giant platelets, agranular platelets
  • Micromegakaryocytes, mononuclear megas

Differential & Function

  • Exclude Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate, copper, metals
  • Parvovirus B19, HIV, drugs, PNH
  • Fanconi, CDA
  • โ†“ MPO and ALP in neutrophils
  • Bleeding with normal platelet count

FAB vs WHO

  • FAB 1982: RA, RARS, RAEB, CMML, RAEB-t
  • FAB AML โ‰ฅ30% ยท WHO โ‰ฅ20%
  • WHO: RCUD, RARS, RCMD, RAEB-1/2, 5qโˆ’, MDS-U
  • CMML โ†’ MDS/MPN ยท RAEB-t โ†’ AML
  • Childhood: refractory cytopenia of childhood

WHO Blast Rules

  • RCUD/RCMD: <1% blood, <5% marrow
  • RAEB-1: 2โ€“4% blood or 5โ€“9% marrow
  • RAEB-2: 5โ€“19% blood or 10โ€“19% marrow
  • Auer rods โ†’ RAEB-2
  • Pancytopenia in RCUD โ†’ MDS-U

Subtypes

  • RCUD: 2โ€“5 yr, 2% โ†’ AML
  • RARS: โ‰ฅ15% RS, erythroid only, 69โ€“108 mo
  • RCMD: โ‰ฅ2 lines; worse than RARS
  • 5qโˆ’: women, 67 yr, โ†‘/N plts, hypolobulated megas
  • 5qโˆ’ survival 145 mo โ†’ lenalidomide

MDS/MPN

  • CMML: mono >1, BCR-ABL1 โˆ’, <20% blasts+promono
  • CMML-1 vs CMML-2 (5/10% cutoffs)
  • aCML: dysplastic neutrophils, Ph โˆ’
  • JMML: 1 moโ€“14 yr, NF1
  • RARS-T: rings + thrombocytosis + JAK2

Genetics & Prognosis

  • Abnormal karyotype 50% de novo, 90โ€“95% t-MDS
  • +8 and โˆ’7 most common
  • Only del(5q) subtype-specific
  • TP53 (bad), RUNX1, TET2 (better), NRAS
  • IPSS-R: 5 groups, 0.8โ€“8.8 yr

Treatment

  • Supportive: transfusions, antibiotics
  • Low risk: EPO/G-CSF, ATG/cyclosporine
  • Lenalidomide: del(5q)
  • High risk: azacitidine, decitabine
  • Cure: HSCT (<70, int-2+ or >10% blasts)

9 ยท Final Memory Map

  • ๐Ÿงฉ MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
    • Etiology
      • Primary vs therapy-related
      • Clonal myeloid stem cell ยท apoptosis paradox
    • Morphology
      • Dyserythropoiesis ยท ring sideroblasts
      • Dysmyelopoiesis ยท pseudo-PHA ยท agranular cells
      • Dysmegakaryopoiesis ยท micromegakaryocytes ยท ALIP
    • Differential
      • Bโ‚โ‚‚/folate ยท copper ยท metals ยท drugs
      • Parvovirus, HIV, PNH, congenital
    • Classification
      • FAB (30%) โ†’ WHO 2008 (20%)
      • RCUD ยท RARS ยท RCMD ยท RAEB-1/2 ยท 5qโˆ’ ยท MDS-U ยท childhood
    • MDS/MPN
      • CMML-1/2 ยท aCML ยท JMML ยท RARS-T
    • Genetics & Prognosis
      • +8, โˆ’7, del(5q) ยท TP53, RUNX1, TET2, NRAS
      • Epigenetic hypermethylation ยท IPSS-R
    • Treatment
      • Supportive ยท growth factors ยท immunosuppression
      • Lenalidomide ยท azacitidine/decitabine ยท HSCT